Ordo Templi Orientis - Ecstatic Creation of Culture
Ordo Templi Orientis Phenomenon
Ordo Templi Orientis: Ecstatic Creation of Culture
Ecstatic Creation of Culture
by P.R. Koenig
In this lecture I shall be concentrating on the following concepts:
Aleister Crowley's magical religion as the basis of present day
occultism.
Euphoric trance-images.
Cabbala as a verbal link between realities.
Occultists associated with occult Orders, and 'free'
occultists.
For certain occultists, reality is made cabbalistically transcendent by
means of the euphoric image in the circumstances, and with the
assistance, of sex. Is Marcuse's "Libido as the transcendental
principle of solidarity experience" being realised in an occult
underground culture?
Both the rational and the irrational may become united in an enlarged
concept of consciousness, with an effect on human behaviour's
orientation. Nonetheless, the question as to why and how these
visionary experiences happen remains open. The one certainty is that
'something' is experienced on a definite but unknown level of
consciousness. This lecture is not the place to discuss how dependent
perceived realities are on consciousness (whether one postulates that
consciousness is collective or not), or to debate the brain's rôle. So
my theme is not the 'whys and wherefores' of visions (such as the
possibility that they represent a fear of what is visible); it is the
way that these visions exist, "what is this kind of occultism able to achieve in
society?"
"The Holy Books" of the occult prophets, for example
Aleister
Crowley, are keys for his disciples to alter consciousness.
Crowley's "inspired" writings burst forth from the cocoon as a
"heavenly" shorthand, which can be applied with a
wordlink/hyperlink (the cabbala as "virtual reality"). It is again
symbolically decoded in order to be used for domestic magical
and consciousness expanding needs. It is unimportant whether
creativity is initiated through intercourse with the phenomena (like
trance), or induced by the phenomena themselves.
Imagination and
interpretation testify to the real - the sacredness of images.
Crowley's disciples call this the "magical succession": to
build
consciousness expansion upon the visions of others. The creativity
released by the visions, and the writing down of visions
themselves, give more reality to the experience, and make it more
holy. This alchemy changes the writer, and the text itself begets
a "magical child" - a world beyond to be shown here in this
world.
This achievement of visibility, that is rich in detail of the
trance-image, is experimental; and angels of observation run
together, jumping from here to there, combining sensuous
fragments. The occultist does not appear to provide a well
supported or unsplintered identity, compared with a traditional
concept of personality.
The indefinable moment of the visions soon determines a new
function of the eye: a "seeing" that extends to all that is
known,
until visual perception becomes more complex. A lack of definition
of relevant experiences in exactitude (eg, the lack of an emphasis
of a bearer of a symbol), which enables new comparisons to be made
between signs and symbols; and maybe new codes and rethoric as a
goal of new structures. Visions become extensions of man into a
state of gnosis. Through the interpretation, an increase of
reflection arises, which cannot be attributed to a particual
author, and cannot be regulated by the chief of any particular
order. Magical succesion does not demand a constant repetition of
a theatrical production (as in the case of organised occultism),
but it is a metaphor for the continuity of the strategies of
illumination.
As an organiser of images experienced in trance, the occultist
reflects back to the archaic idea of creation by idealistic
aesthetics. He suspends authorship in the materialistic sense
(similar to the conceptions of Marcel Duchamps or Andy Warhol),
whilst re-organising what has already been created through visions
received in trance; and in this way "old" traditions are welded
together into a new entirety.
Like surrealism, occultism tries to break the domination of
rational philosophy and logic, stressed by Descartes. Occultism is
based on the belief in a higher reality of certain forms of
association through the cabbala, faith in the power of dream- and
trance-images, and in the stream of words uncensored by the
intellect. As many voices, colours and material as is possible,
need to be perceived in the underground culture of the occultist.
A euphoria of images and voices determines his identity and
reflection. Like every Utopia, this one draws its power from envy
for a world without limits, and unveils that primordial wish of
man, on the one hand to be master of his own reality, and on the
other to escape its chains. Gnosis demands the removal of
structure from life itself.
The occultist strives after world dominion and ambivalently glides
between destruction of the culture (through resistance to the
ruling morality), and the preservation of the High- and Mass-
cultures (as he requires their magical traditions). There exists
no alternative to this totalitarian claim on the same level, or
with the same claim to significance. This is why the occultist
swings between transcendentally seeking cultural anticipation, and
its counterpart, a hope for destruction of the existing culture.
The intoxication of aesthetic and/or libertine ecstasy, celebrates
new cults. Comparisons can be made in occidental spiritual history
(the cabbalistic encyclopedias of the Renaissance, and humanistic
faith in the good of togetherness). "Who is actually
speaking?"
brings us to the question of the occult mechanisms of visions and
voices. The subject must be kept separate from cultural questions,
and is only really of concern for the legal branches of occult
organisations. In the world of the "free" occultist (that
is,
those who are not bound to any order or secret society) everything
is both equally important and insignificant. The subject has been
set free from the gravity of its uniqueness and becomes a forum
for influences of every kind. This blend and consistency
determines the momentary state or condition of its subject. The
mix is everything, and becomes a potentially infinite reservoir of
signs. This deluge of voices and visions can be decoded by its
receiver according to their particular kind. The occult utopia
seeks the realisation of the existence of a worldwide web of
unified sole individuals, and wishes to change society and culture
more lastingly and comprehensively than the achievement of
socialism. This network, a kind of occult internet, removes every
geographical and social distance, and shows itself as a space free
of legal borders despite resistance from single states or unities
of governments, who want to exercise rule and effective control.
There are rather mechanisms imminent in the occult system which
set a limit on the prosperity and effectiveness of occult culture:
Shall the recipient accept every vision and voice which he
perceives in trance? Shall he voluntarily limit himself to a
couple of selected "givers of impulse" (As occult
organisations
are); or shall he start a conscious programme of selection from
the esoteric and occult supermarket which will be universally
plundered and leave only a completely devalued treasury of total
subjectivity?
The building of the development of culture is hindered by occult
organisations (for example the several
OTO-groups), because their
totalitarian attitude to culture (as in every cultural society),
consists of "repetitions" of rituals,
signs, etc. with little
original thought or practice. The individual is expected to "find
themselves" in this cultural repetition, which hinders creativity.
The supreme visionary, founder of meaning, maker of images, and
source of actual occult streams is Aleister Crowley (allegedly,
head of an OTO-group). His visionary blueprint is overshadowed by
his deficient biography. Crowley died in 1947, and is now
controlled by his alleged possessors of
copyrights: that is, one
OTO-group, this shows how the needs of lust and the wishes of the
body are to be controlled. Particularly strongly, their mastering
of body and consciousness is shown in their control of the
euphoria of imaging through dogmatically fixed tables of values
(eg: 729 = Baphomet), and through bringing sexuality as sexmagic
in a form of ecstatic limitation. Sensuality becomes a theatre of
war of culture creation. The conscious self-slavery (often
controlled by the holder of copyright of occult doctrine), serves
as a radical counter-blueprint to the mainstream-culture.
Subjugation to the occult dogma is experienced as the realm of
freedom - although the achieved dissolution of the ego turns out
to be the product of an over-strong ego. The occultist understands
himself as a rebel and a narcissus, who sets himself IN and
BESIDES the predominant culture. His icon worship is not separated
from a ban on images (eg in the rejection of Christianity): He
understands himself as part of an elite,and as a reflecting
psychopath, he endeavours to create himself anew. Even he tries to
undergo again each stage of biological and familiar programming.
Many occultists believe they can consciously
change their genetic
material. The body, especially the head, not only is
metaphorically the seat of perception and thinking, but it is a
factual nervous switchboard, transporting all in-coming
information.
The intensitiy of his experience, is the sole quality in which the
occultist is interested. Occult culture means the death of
sequential, linear thought; an erosion of people's ability to plan
and manage their own lives. The resulting lack of space, can serve
as a metaphor for a loss of bearing, reference, and meaning.
Hence, such extreme occult utopias fail: only a few seekers after
cultures are ready and willing to break out of their mainstream
culture. Therefore, most hard-core occultists remain stuck in
their hope of salvation, and are swaying between relaxation beyong
this world, and their indistinctness in this world, whether on the
kitchen table or in the marriage bed. This is what they call
Gnosis: and it is going to be regulated by hierarchical
organisations, whose self-reflection turns out to be a critically
immune self-reverentiality which narrows down the occult
subculture and paralyses it. Even to the most reconcilable
romantics, it is clear that occultism is no domain of the genuine,
truthful and good.
This unreflected system of communication, serves everyone who is
willing to use it. Therefore, occultism without contradiction,
manifests itself in already existing structures (eg power
orientated organisations, eg OTO), or installs itself in
social-cultural niches of potentials of fear and aggression ("satanism",
"secret societies"). Innumerable often competing organisations
(eg
OTO splinter groups) cannot establish a move into the promised
land, or to the New Age; but retreat to the old values of power
and consummation in a universe that has been delivered to cults of
objects and religios artifacts. Certain conditions of being are
defined as: biased analysis, moods as programmes, self-perception
as cultural attainment, and pure imagination as relevation: are
the new determinations. Dogmatisation infantilises the contents,
those seeking for directness become enmeshed in a sacredised
repertoire of rituals of self-dissolution, without effectively
overcoming the ego. Today, in the circus of the images of the
world, occultism is the continuation of fashions, of habits or
mannerisms of how to display oneself, and of pseudo-originality.
The cultural reality of the occultist makes a symbolic breakdown
into signals of hierarchy. To experience, to record and to
process, is reduced to already fixed images in a consciousness-
dissolving way. The step from "finding" to "inventing" becomes
methodically and mathematical, by being equipped with the help of
the cabbala! The occultist acts as an archaic modeller at the
boundary station of the entanglement between a visible and
invisible world, where the unheard from the underground realm want
to communicate themselves - and only find inflation of Gnosis and
ego.
Therefore, the occultism I have described above achieves thus only
a glance at the philosophical value of High culture, and gives a
description of Mass culture.
Das Milieu des Templer Reichs - Die Sklaven Sollen Dienen. Hanns Heinz Ewers - Lanz von Liebenfels - Karl Germer, Arnoldo Krumm-Heller - Martha Kuentzel - Friedrich Lekve - Hermann Joseph Metzger - Christian Bouchet - Paolo Fogagnolo - James Wasserman. Unbequeme Aspekte in der Geschichte von O.T.O. und Thelema